Travelodge back with plan for 18 storey Greenwich hotel

Travelodge have submitted plans for an 18-storey hotel in Greenwich after earlier plans were rejected last year. As with the prior application around 300 rooms are on the cards.

It’s certainly a bolder design than that refused last year, yet an almost entirely grey cladding choice is proposed.

2018 plans 

Gloomy is the likely result with this covering a building of sizable massing:

Any colour so long as its grey

That’ll lift the spirits.

Render show it almost translucent against a blue sky. Give over. The chances of that are slim. A hulking grey mass will be the probable reality.

Site plan

The site isn’t the most salubrious, being as it is beside the Blackwall Tunnel approach. But then again, the target customer will be people down for a night or two looking to stay somewhere cheap while watching a gig at the o2 (or forthcoming new music venue Magazine).

Not the best – the link to the river

The plan is dependent upon controversial demolition of the nearby gasholder – or its reworking into alternative use. Brenntags chemical storage works (seen above to the right of the wall) also results in the hotel being set back beyond a minimum required distance.

Nearby Gasholder

A replacement footbridge is planned which seems a shame as the current bridge is one of the few things of merit in the area with its winding access ramps.

The applicant has met with TfL to ensure that it does not impose upon Silvertown Tunnel construction.

Current bridge

Remote location

Last year’s plan proposed public realm improvements around the footbridge over the A102 beside the hotel site, yet wider improvements beyond that were extremely limited.

That wasn’t Travelodge’s fault however as Greenwich Council had insisted that much  Section 106 income was to go to GLLaB (£263,800) versus just £50k for the street the building was located and just £10k improving pedestrian links to the o2 and Greenwich town centre. Absolutely nothing for paths to the river, which as seen below are extremely poor.

Current path leading to Greenwich via the Thames path

The other side isn’t much better where just £10k was allocated with some roads lacking even any adjacent paving .

As a hotel the site would see high amounts of Community Infrastructure Levy income at £100 per square metre in addition to S106. This is higher than residential development at £70 per sq metre in this area.

Base of bridge

Will the plans pass the Planning Board this time around?

Do you enjoy reading local news and finding out what’s going on? If so, please consider supporting me and the site here via Paypal. Unlike the old press, I get out on the ground to see the context of new plans. I know the area (hence the pics and knowledge of poor pedestrians links). You can also become a patron here.

A massive thanks to all those who have supported me. It’s invaluable and I’m extremely grateful.

Click here to view new and revised plans on the Greenwich Council planning portal.

 

------------------

Running a site takes time and costs money.

You can support me via Paypal with a one-off or monthly donation here

Another option is via Patreon by clicking here

You can also buy me a beer/coffee at Ko-fi here

Many thanks

There's also a Facebook page for the site here

J Smith

I've lived in south east London most of my life growing up in Greenwich borough and working in the area for many years. The site has contributors on occasion and we cover many different topics. Living and working in the area offers an insight into what is happening locally.

    One thought on “Travelodge back with plan for 18 storey Greenwich hotel

    • Are your photos recent? That burnt out motorbike was there last autumn!

      Re. GLLaB, what is the money spent on exactly? They’re not providing jobs themselves but helping people find jobs with local businesses.

      Reply

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.